> Yeah, we could do something like this, perhaps not in exactly this
> way, but I'm not sure it's a good idea to just execute the parallel
> plan without workers.
sure, executing parallel plans w/o workers seems a bit of a hack. But:
- we already do it this way in some other situations
- the alternative in this special situation would be to _force_ replanning without the CURSOR_OPT_PARALLEL_OK. The
decisionfor replanning is hidden deep within plancache.c and while we could influence it with CURSOR_OPT_CUSTOM_PLAN
thiswouldn't have an effect if the prepared statement doesn't have any parameters. Additionally, influencing the
decisionand generating a non-parallel plan would shift the avg cost calculation used to choose custom or generic plans.
Maybe someone can come up with a better idea for a solution. These three approaches are all I see so far.
Best regards,
Tobias Bussmann
