"Gregory Stark (as CFM)" <stark.cfm@gmail.com> writes:
> Hm. This patch is still waiting on updates. But it's a bug fix and it
> would be good to get this in. Is someone else interested in finishing
> this if Jeite isn't available?
I think the patch as-submitted is pretty uninteresting, mainly because the
design of adding bespoke lock code for subscription objects doesn't scale.
I'm not excited about doing this just for subscriptions without at least a
clear plan for working on other object types.
Alvaro suggested switching it to use get_object_address() instead, which'd
be better; but before going in that direction we might have to do more
work on get_object_address's error reporting (note the para in its header
comments saying it's pretty weak on that).
regards, tom lane
