Re: WIP: SP-GiST, Space-Partitioned GiST - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: WIP: SP-GiST, Space-Partitioned GiST
Date
Msg-id 9550.1323880595@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WIP: SP-GiST, Space-Partitioned GiST  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: WIP: SP-GiST, Space-Partitioned GiST  (Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> Right at the moment, my local copy has completely broken handling of
> WAL, because I've been focusing on the opclass interface and didn't
> worry about WAL while I was whacking the picksplit code around.
> I'll try to clean that up today and then post a new version of the
> patch.

I promised a patch, so here is what I've got now.  At this point I've
been through most of the code at least once.  I'm fairly happy with the
opclass interface details, and have brought the documentation for that
to what seems a committable state.  I have a lot of other loose ends
still to look at, but I think the major commit blocker at this point is
the VACUUM code, which I don't like/trust at all.  I'll comment on that
more in a separate message.

            regards, tom lane


Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "David E. Wheeler"
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump --exclude-table-data
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PostgreSQL fails to build with 32bit MinGW-w64