Re: new commitfest transition guidance - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: new commitfest transition guidance
Date
Msg-id 953674.1738801775@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: new commitfest transition guidance  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Responses Re: new commitfest transition guidance
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> writes:
> Evidently this new policy is why my skip scan patch series wasn't
> being tested by CI.

Well no, the reason CI wasn't testing anything was the cfbot was
broken.  See nearby "CFBot is broken" thread.

> I just don't think that this new policy makes sense. At least not as
> implemented.

I'm a little dubious about it too, but let's not conflate this
question with plain ol' infrastructure bugs.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: new commitfest transition guidance
Next
From: "Euler Taveira"
Date:
Subject: Re: Separate GUC for replication origins