Re: Refactor GetLockStatusData() by skipping unused backends and groups - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On 2024/10/24 11:12, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
>> So, probably
>> we can consider that this check is already in place. If it’s still worth adding,
>> perhaps placing it inside the FAST_PATH_SLOT() macro could be an option...
>> Or current assertion check is enough? Thought?
> 
> Given that it's already done in FAST_PATH_GET_BITS(), I think that's fine as it
> is and v2 LGTM.

Thanks for the review! Pushed.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION