On 2024/10/24 11:12, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
>> So, probably
>> we can consider that this check is already in place. If it’s still worth adding,
>> perhaps placing it inside the FAST_PATH_SLOT() macro could be an option...
>> Or current assertion check is enough? Thought?
>
> Given that it's already done in FAST_PATH_GET_BITS(), I think that's fine as it
> is and v2 LGTM.
Thanks for the review! Pushed.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION