Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] Interval for launching the table sync worker - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Interval for launching the table sync worker
Date
Msg-id 9485a57c-4441-7435-2898-015b28cf7bac@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Interval for launching the table sync worker  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 4/27/17 21:20, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> Isn't it better to use  != NIL instead as follows?
> 
>    else if (table_state != NIL && last_start_times)

I'm not a fan of that in general, and it doesn't really add any clarity
here.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Interval for launching the table sync worker
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Crash when partition column specified twice