Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> I've been working on SQL procedures.
No comment yet on the big picture here, but ...
> The provided procedural languages (an ever more
> confusing term) each needed a small touch-up to handle pg_proc entries
> with prorettype == 0.
Putting 0 in prorettype seems like a pretty bad idea. Why not use VOIDOID
for the prorettype value? Or if there is some reason why "void" isn't the
right pseudotype, maybe you should invent a new one, analogous to the
"trigger" and "event_trigger" pseudotypes.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
