On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Dave is talking about Greg Stark here, lest anyone credit me for something I
Err, yes indeed. Sorry. Keep forgetting that postgresql.org is the
only place in the world with more Gregs than Daves...
> wasn't involved in. I just updated the shared_buffers section of "Tuning
> Your PostgreSQL Server" to reflect Dave's comments and to generally clean up
> the Windows suggestions here. I recall seeing some comments in the past
> that suggested earlier systems started to fall off at closer to 64MB rather
> than 128MB, tweaked the wording there accordingly. 8MB working out best is
> really unexpected though; I'd like to know what you were doing where *that*
> was the optimal setting.
Thanks.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
