Re: Client application name - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: Client application name
Date
Msg-id 937d27e10910130820l8e77ba8j9934a937c68c7480@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Client application name  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: Client application name
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>
> Doing it with a GUC will not be nearly so useful as having it in the wire
> protocol, IMNSHO. Just one example: it wouldn't be present in connection
> records, because it wouldn't be set yet.

I quite like the flexibility of being able to set/show a GUC at any
time, but you raise a good point. I'll need to venture into previously
unknown territory (for me at least :-p) to figure out how best to do
that, and if possible keep the GUC...


-- 
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK:   http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: Client application name
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Client application name