On 18/01/2008, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Hm? integer_datetimes is encoded separately and there's a very specific
> error message if it's wrong. The case I think you are remembering was
> caused by a width-of-time_t discrepancy, which should be fixed but it's
> got nothing to do with anything else.
Yeah, I think you're probably right there.
> Zero cost and also zero benefit. The missing piece of information here
> was that the executable being used was running under PPC emulation, and
> I'll bet money that there would have been nothing in either uname or
> pg_config output that would have told us that.
I'd wager there would be a fairly good chance that a PPC-only binary
on a Mac would most likely have been built on a PPC, and thus mention
that in the uname output at build time. I can't imagine many folks are
building PPC-only binaries on Intels.
How much money did you have in mind? :-)
/D
