Re: PostgreSQL 12, JIT defaults - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: PostgreSQL 12, JIT defaults
Date
Msg-id 9351D2C1-D5C1-49F2-A862-A2654A65E85B@anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL 12, JIT defaults  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL 12, JIT defaults  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Re: PostgreSQL 12, JIT defaults  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Re: PostgreSQL 12, JIT defaults  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: PostgreSQL 12, JIT defaults  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Re: PostgreSQL 12, JIT defaults  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Re: PostgreSQL 12, JIT defaults  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers

On October 8, 2018 8:03:56 AM PDT, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
>> Where is the jit=on coming from? Config from before it was turned
>off?
>
>A look in guc.c shows that jit defaults to "on" whether or not JIT is
>enabled at compile time.

I thought Pavel was talking about 11 somehow...


> This seems, at best, rather user-unfriendly.
>And it's not like our conventions for other compile-option-affected
>GUCs, eg the SSL ones.

That was intentional, even though it perhaps should be better documented. That allows a distro to build and distribute
pgwithout llvm enabled, but then have the JIT package with all the dependencies separately. The pg yum packages do so. 

Andres
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 12, JIT defaults
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 12, JIT defaults