Re: TOAST and TEXT - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: TOAST and TEXT
Date
Msg-id 9327.1002774767@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to TOAST and TEXT  (Chris Bitmead <chris@bitmead.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Chris Bitmead <chris@bitmead.com> writes:
> ... I don't
> like the old large object implementation, I need to store very large
> numbers of objects and unless this implementation has changed
> in recent times it won't cut it.

Have you looked at 7.1?  AFAIK it has no particular problem with
lots of LOs.

Which is not to discourage you from going over to bytea fields instead,
if that model happens to be more convenient for your application.
But your premise above seems false.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: iso-8859-15/16 to MULE
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump oid problems