Re: remove more archiving overhead - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Steele
Subject Re: remove more archiving overhead
Date
Msg-id 9245a010-1f2e-af05-6268-c049934a55d0@pgmasters.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: remove more archiving overhead  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 8/2/22 01:02, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2022 at 11:51:56PM -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
>> Inviting the administrator to resolve things is more dangerous than just
>> returning true.  I recommend making this text more opinionated and simpler:
>> libraries must return true.  Alternately, if some library has found a good
>> reason to return false, this paragraph could give the reason.  I don't know of
>> such a reason, though.
> 
> Your suggestion seems reasonable to me.  I've attached a small patch.

+1. I think this is less confusing overall.

Regards,
-David



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Add proper planner support for ORDER BY / DISTINCT aggregates
Next
From: Junwang Zhao
Date:
Subject: [PATCH] Add a inline function to eliminate duplicate code