Re: WIP: Relaxing the constraints on numeric scale - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Subject | Re: WIP: Relaxing the constraints on numeric scale |
Date | |
Msg-id | 923213.1627055409@sss.pgh.pa.us Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: WIP: Relaxing the constraints on numeric scale (Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>) |
Responses |
Re: WIP: Relaxing the constraints on numeric scale
|
List | pgsql-hackers |
Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> writes: > All your other suggestions make sense too. Attached is a new version. OK, I've now studied this more closely, and have some additional nitpicks: * I felt the way you did the documentation was confusing. It seems better to explain the normal case first, and then describe the two extended cases. * As long as we're encapsulating typmod construction/extraction, let's also encapsulate the checks for valid typmods. * Other places are fairly careful to declare typmod values as "int32", so I think this code should too. Attached is a proposed delta patch making those changes. (I made the docs mention that the extension cases are allowed as of v15. While useful in the short run, that will look like noise in ten years; so I could go either way on whether to do that.) If you're good with these, then I think it's ready to go. I'll mark it RfC in the commitfest. regards, tom lane diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/datatype.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/datatype.sgml index 6abda2f1d2..d3c70667a3 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/datatype.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/datatype.sgml @@ -545,8 +545,8 @@ <programlisting> NUMERIC(<replaceable>precision</replaceable>, <replaceable>scale</replaceable>) </programlisting> - The precision must be positive, the scale may be positive or negative - (see below). Alternatively: + The precision must be positive, while the scale may be positive or + negative (see below). Alternatively: <programlisting> NUMERIC(<replaceable>precision</replaceable>) </programlisting> @@ -569,8 +569,8 @@ NUMERIC <note> <para> The maximum precision that can be explicitly specified in - a <type>NUMERIC</type> type declaration is 1000. An - unconstrained <type>NUMERIC</type> column is subject to the limits + a <type>numeric</type> type declaration is 1000. An + unconstrained <type>numeric</type> column is subject to the limits described in <xref linkend="datatype-numeric-table"/>. </para> </note> @@ -578,38 +578,48 @@ NUMERIC <para> If the scale of a value to be stored is greater than the declared scale of the column, the system will round the value to the specified - number of fractional digits. If the declared scale of the column is - negative, the value will be rounded to the left of the decimal point. - If, after rounding, the number of digits to the left of the decimal point - exceeds the declared precision minus the declared scale, an error is - raised. Similarly, if the declared scale exceeds the declared precision - and the number of zero digits to the right of the decimal point is less - than the declared scale minus the declared precision, an error is raised. + number of fractional digits. Then, if the number of digits to the + left of the decimal point exceeds the declared precision minus the + declared scale, an error is raised. For example, a column declared as <programlisting> NUMERIC(3, 1) </programlisting> - will round values to 1 decimal place and be able to store values between - -99.9 and 99.9, inclusive. A column declared as + will round values to 1 decimal place and can store values between + -99.9 and 99.9, inclusive. + </para> + + <para> + Beginning in <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> 15, it is allowed + to declare a <type>numeric</type> column with a negative scale. Then + values will be rounded to the left of the decimal point. The + precision still represents the maximum number of non-rounded digits. + Thus, a column declared as <programlisting> NUMERIC(2, -3) </programlisting> - will round values to the nearest thousand and be able to store values - between -99000 and 99000, inclusive. A column declared as + will round values to the nearest thousand and can store values + between -99000 and 99000, inclusive. + It is also allowed to declare a scale larger than the declared + precision. Such a column can only hold fractional values, and it + requires the number of zero digits just to the right of the decimal + point to be at least the declared scale minus the declared precision. + For example, a column declared as <programlisting> NUMERIC(3, 5) </programlisting> - will round values to 5 decimal places and be able to store values between + will round values to 5 decimal places and can store values between -0.00999 and 0.00999, inclusive. </para> <note> <para> - The scale in a <type>NUMERIC</type> type declaration may be any value in - the range -1000 to 1000. (The <acronym>SQL</acronym> standard requires - the scale to be in the range 0 to <replaceable>precision</replaceable>. - Using values outside this range may not be portable to other database - systems.) + <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> permits the scale in + a <type>numeric</type> type declaration to be any value in the range + -1000 to 1000. However, the <acronym>SQL</acronym> standard requires + the scale to be in the range 0 + to <replaceable>precision</replaceable>. Using scales outside that + range may not be portable to other database systems. </para> </note> diff --git a/src/backend/utils/adt/numeric.c b/src/backend/utils/adt/numeric.c index 46cb37cea1..faff09f5d5 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/adt/numeric.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/adt/numeric.c @@ -827,21 +827,31 @@ numeric_is_integral(Numeric num) * * For purely historical reasons VARHDRSZ is then added to the result, thus * the unused space in the upper 16 bits is not all as freely available as it - * might seem. + * might seem. (We can't let the result overflow to a negative int32, as + * other parts of the system would interpret that as not-a-valid-typmod.) */ -static inline int +static inline int32 make_numeric_typmod(int precision, int scale) { return ((precision << 16) | (scale & 0x7ff)) + VARHDRSZ; } +/* + * Because of the offset, valid numeric typmods are at least VARHDRSZ + */ +static inline bool +is_valid_numeric_typmod(int32 typmod) +{ + return typmod >= (int32) VARHDRSZ; +} + /* * numeric_typmod_precision() - * * Extract the precision from a numeric typmod --- see make_numeric_typmod(). */ static inline int -numeric_typmod_precision(int typmod) +numeric_typmod_precision(int32 typmod) { return ((typmod - VARHDRSZ) >> 16) & 0xffff; } @@ -856,7 +866,7 @@ numeric_typmod_precision(int typmod) * extends an 11-bit two's complement number x. */ static inline int -numeric_typmod_scale(int typmod) +numeric_typmod_scale(int32 typmod) { return (((typmod - VARHDRSZ) & 0x7ff) ^ 1024) - 1024; } @@ -872,7 +882,7 @@ numeric_maximum_size(int32 typmod) int precision; int numeric_digits; - if (typmod < (int32) (VARHDRSZ)) + if (!is_valid_numeric_typmod(typmod)) return -1; /* precision (ie, max # of digits) is in upper bits of typmod */ @@ -1136,14 +1146,14 @@ numeric_support(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) int32 new_precision = numeric_typmod_precision(new_typmod); /* - * If new_typmod < VARHDRSZ, the destination is unconstrained; - * that's always OK. If old_typmod >= VARHDRSZ, the source is + * If new_typmod is invalid, the destination is unconstrained; + * that's always OK. If old_typmod is valid, the source is * constrained, and we're OK if the scale is unchanged and the * precision is not decreasing. See further notes in function * header comment. */ - if (new_typmod < (int32) VARHDRSZ || - (old_typmod >= (int32) VARHDRSZ && + if (!is_valid_numeric_typmod(new_typmod) || + (is_valid_numeric_typmod(old_typmod) && new_scale == old_scale && new_precision >= old_precision)) ret = relabel_to_typmod(source, new_typmod); } @@ -1186,7 +1196,7 @@ numeric (PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) * If the value isn't a valid type modifier, simply return a copy of the * input value */ - if (typmod < (int32) (VARHDRSZ)) + if (!is_valid_numeric_typmod(typmod)) PG_RETURN_NUMERIC(duplicate_numeric(num)); /* @@ -1288,7 +1298,7 @@ numerictypmodout(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) int32 typmod = PG_GETARG_INT32(0); char *res = (char *) palloc(64); - if (typmod >= 0) + if (is_valid_numeric_typmod(typmod)) snprintf(res, 64, "(%d,%d)", numeric_typmod_precision(typmod), numeric_typmod_scale(typmod)); @@ -7476,8 +7486,8 @@ apply_typmod(NumericVar *var, int32 typmod) int ddigits; int i; - /* Do nothing if we have a default typmod (-1) */ - if (typmod < (int32) (VARHDRSZ)) + /* Do nothing if we have an invalid typmod */ + if (!is_valid_numeric_typmod(typmod)) return; precision = numeric_typmod_precision(typmod); @@ -7565,7 +7575,7 @@ apply_typmod_special(Numeric num, int32 typmod) return; /* Do nothing if we have a default typmod (-1) */ - if (typmod < (int32) (VARHDRSZ)) + if (!is_valid_numeric_typmod(typmod)) return; precision = numeric_typmod_precision(typmod);
pgsql-hackers by date: