> On Sep 12, 2024, at 13:39, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> External Email
>
>
> I was looking at all that, and this is only moving code around. While
> the part for heap_xlog_logical_rewrite in rewriteheap.c is a bit sad
> but historical, the header cleanup in heapam.c is nice.
>
> Seeing heap_execute_freeze_tuple in heapam.h due to the dependency to
> XLH_INVALID_XVAC and XLH_FREEZE_XVAC is slightly surprising, but the
> opposite where heap_execute_freeze_tuple() would be in heapam_xlog.h
> was less interesting. Just to say that I am agreeing with you here
> and I have let this part as you suggested originally.
>
> I was wondering for a bit about the order of the functions for heap
> and heap, but these are ordered in their own, which is also OK. I
> have added a few more comments at the top of each subroutine for the
> records to be more consistent, and applied the result.
> —
> Michael
>
I am so glad to see that my patch got committed. Thank you a lot for it!
This is my first accepted patch. It really means a lot to me.
Yong