Re: SQL/JSON: JSON_TABLE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: SQL/JSON: JSON_TABLE
Date
Msg-id 9090441f-a9c0-9e58-4c4a-5aaa21b3b126@2ndQuadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SQL/JSON: JSON_TABLE  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: SQL/JSON: JSON_TABLE
Re: SQL/JSON: JSON_TABLE
List pgsql-hackers
On 5/8/21 2:23 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 4/12/21 11:34 AM, Erik Rijkers wrote:
>>> On 2021.03.27. 02:12 Nikita Glukhov <n.gluhov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
>>> Attached 47th version of the patches.
>> We're past feature freeze for 14 and alas, JSON_TABLE has not made it.
>>
>> I have tested quite a bit with it and because I didn't find any trouble with functionality or speed, I wanted to at
leastmention that here once.
 
>>
>> I looked at v47, these files
>>> [0001-SQL-JSON-functions-v47.patch]
>>> [0002-JSON_TABLE-v47.patch]
>>> [0003-JSON_TABLE-PLAN-DEFAULT-clause-v47.patch]
>>> [0004-JSON_TABLE-PLAN-clause-v47.patch]
>>> [manual_addition_fixed.patch]  # for this see [1], [2]
>>    (v47 doesn't apply anymore, as cfbot shows, but instances can still be built on top of 6131ffc43ff from 30 march
2021)
>>
>> I hope it will fare better next round, version 15.
>>
>
> Me too. Here's a set that should remove the bitrot.
>
>

Rebased for removal of serial schedule


cheers


andrew


--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com


Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: SQL/JSON: functions
Next
From: Matthias van de Meent
Date:
Subject: Re: Lowering the ever-growing heap->pd_lower