Re: Proposal for Signal Detection Refactoring - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Proposal for Signal Detection Refactoring
Date
Msg-id 907A1E93-BA21-40CE-B86E-BF4D84242567@anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposal for Signal Detection Refactoring  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

On October 9, 2018 6:58:18 AM PDT, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>On 25/09/2018 02:23, Andres Freund wrote:
>>> My point was just to reduce the number of variables used and ease
>>> debugger lookups with what is on the stack.
>> I'm not sure a bitflag really gives you that - before gdb gives you
>the
>> plain value, afterwards you need to know the enum values and do bit
>math
>> to know.
>
>You could use an actual C bit field, to make debugging easier.

See Tom's reply to this suggestion...

Andres
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: executor relation handling
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: Index Skip Scan