Re: logical column position - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: logical column position
Date
Msg-id 9022.1069388851@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: logical column position  (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>)
Responses Re: logical column position
Re: logical column position
List pgsql-hackers
Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes:
> Actually, I deliberately chose attpos rather than attlognum (which is
> what some people had been calling this feature earlier). My reasoning
> was that the "logical number" is really a nonsensical idea: we just
> invented it on the spot.

True ...

> In contrast, a "position" is a fairly natural
> thing for an attribute to have -- it's a notion with some counterpart
> in the real world.

But "position" could at least as logically be considered to mean the
physical position in the tuple.  I still say that these names are ripe
for confusion.

I don't have a better choice of name offhand, but if we spend 1% of the
time already spent arguing about these issues on finding a better name,
I'm sure we can think of one ;-)
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Handy user/group hack
Next
From: Rod Taylor
Date:
Subject: Re: logical column position