> On 10 Oct 2024, at 09:22, Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin.bonnefoy@datadoghq.com> wrote:
> psql tries to read the previous word when matches are NULL. However,
> there's no previous word set here, leading to the segfault.
>
> I've attached a patch that checks if the previous word does exist
> before trying to use it, along with an additional test for this
> codepath.
Nice, I was just typing up an email with the same fix when your landed in my
inbox after having ended up with a segfaulting psql testing a patch. (I didn't
include a test though so yours is better.) From reading the code I agree that
we must check previous_words_count here so +1 on this patch.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
