Re: Non-empty default log_line_prefix - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Non-empty default log_line_prefix
Date
Msg-id 8e48f55c-98e3-a855-e7be-9fcb2955d36c@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Non-empty default log_line_prefix  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 10/12/16 11:40 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> There would be some value in the complexity you're thinking of for
> installations that log to multiple targets concurrently, but really,
> who does that?

I see that a lot.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Non-empty default log_line_prefix