Re: Non-empty default log_line_prefix - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Non-empty default log_line_prefix
Date
Msg-id 5f43d531-6fcb-2ecf-a8ac-dcab08adb168@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Non-empty default log_line_prefix  (Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>)
Responses Re: Non-empty default log_line_prefix  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 10/12/16 11:58 AM, Christoph Berg wrote:
> (Yes, the '' default might be fine for syslog, but I don't think
> that's a good argument for sticking with it for default installs. I've
> seen way too many useless log files out there, and at worst we'll have
> syslogs with two timestamps.)

We'd have to think of a way to sort this out during upgrades.
Documentation might be enough.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Non-empty default log_line_prefix
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: parallel.sgml