Re: Amcheck verification of GiST and GIN - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tomas Vondra
Subject Re: Amcheck verification of GiST and GIN
Date
Msg-id 8c8cc305-325b-4fa5-89f6-b63412bbe0d3@vondra.me
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Amcheck verification of GiST and GIN  (Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Amcheck verification of GiST and GIN
List pgsql-hackers
On 3/28/25 20:51, Kirill Reshke wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Mar 2025 at 21:26, Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me> wrote:
>>
>> Here's a polished version of the patches. If you have any
>> comments/objections, please speak now.
>> --
>> Tomas Vondra
> 
> Hi, no objections, lgtm
> 

I've pushed all the parts of this patch series, except for the stress
test - which I think was not meant for commit.

buildfarm seems happy so far, except for a minor indentation issue
(forgot to reindent after merging the separate fix patch).

Marked as committed in the CFA - that's not entirely correct, because
the original patch series also included amcheck support for GiST, but
that was not committed. I suggest we open a new CF entry if that gets
resubmitted for PG19 (I hope that will be the case).



Thanks for the patches, reviews, etc.!


-- 
Tomas Vondra




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Why does wait_for_log() return current file size
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: in BeginCopyTo make materialized view using COPY TO instead of COPY (query).