Re: ALTER TABLE ... SET STORAGE does not propagate to indexes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: ALTER TABLE ... SET STORAGE does not propagate to indexes
Date
Msg-id 8be09419-ed3d-93f9-9c29-2824b44a2c56@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ALTER TABLE ... SET STORAGE does not propagate to indexes  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: ALTER TABLE ... SET STORAGE does not propagate to indexes  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2020-04-22 01:56, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I'm surprised that this hasn't applied yet, because:
> 
> On 2020-Apr-09, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> 
>> One thing to remember is that the current situation is broken.  While you
>> can set index columns to have different storage than the corresponding table
>> columns, pg_dump does not preserve that, because it dumps indexes after
>> ALTER TABLE commands.  So at the moment, having these two things different
>> isn't really supported.
> 
> So I have to ask -- are you planning to get this patch pushed and
> backpatched?

I think I should, but I figured I want to give some extra time for 
people to consider the horror that I created in the test_decoding tests.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix for pg_statio_all_tables
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel Append can break run-time partition pruning