Re: strange valgrind failures (again) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tomas Vondra
Subject Re: strange valgrind failures (again)
Date
Msg-id 8b7acd94-0135-e83e-6b1f-3aa9f608e324@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: strange valgrind failures (again)  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: strange valgrind failures (again)  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 1/15/19 3:11 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 2019-01-15 03:07:10 +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>> I've started observing funny valgrind failures on Fedora 28, possibly
>> after upgrading from 3.14.0-1 to 3.14.0-7 a couple of days ago. This
>> time it does not seem like platform-specific issues, though - the
>> failures all look like this:
> 
> Any chance you're compiling without USE_VALGRIND defined? IIRC these are
> precisely what the VALGRIND_MAKE_MEM_DEFINED calls in inval.c are
> intended to fight:
>     /*
>      * Define padding bytes in SharedInvalidationMessage structs to be
>      * defined. Otherwise the sinvaladt.c ringbuffer, which is accessed by
>      * multiple processes, will cause spurious valgrind warnings about
>      * undefined memory being used. That's because valgrind remembers the
>      * undefined bytes from the last local process's store, not realizing that
>      * another process has written since, filling the previously uninitialized
>      * bytes
>      */
>     VALGRIND_MAKE_MEM_DEFINED(&msg, sizeof(msg));
> 
> 

... the bang you might have just heard was me facepalming

Yes, I've been compiling without USE_VALGRIND, because I've been
rebuilding using a command from shell history and the command-line grew
a bit too long to notice that.

Anyway, I find it interesting that valgrind notices this particular
place and not the other places, and that it only starts happening after
a couple of minutes of running the regression tests (~5 minutes or so).

regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Prepare Transaction support for ON COMMIT DROP temporary tables
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: Query with high planning time at version 11.1 compared versions10.5 and 11.0