Allow CLUSTER, VACUUM FULL and REINDEX to change tablespace on thefly - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alexey Kondratov
Subject Allow CLUSTER, VACUUM FULL and REINDEX to change tablespace on thefly
Date
Msg-id 8a8f5f73-00d3-55f8-7583-1375ca8f6a91@postgrespro.ru
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Allow CLUSTER, VACUUM FULL and REINDEX to change tablespace onthe fly
List pgsql-hackers
Hi Hackers,

I would like to propose a change, which allow CLUSTER, VACUUM FULL and 
REINDEX to modify relation tablespace on the fly. Actually, all these 
commands rebuild relation filenodes from the scratch, thus it seems 
natural to allow specifying them a new location. It may be helpful, when 
a server went out of disk, so you can attach new partition and perform 
e.g. VACUUM FULL, which will free some space and move data to a new 
location at the same time. Otherwise, you cannot complete VACUUM FULL 
until you have up to x2 relation disk space on a single partition.

Please, find attached a patch, which extend CLUSTER, VACUUM FULL and 
REINDEX with additional options:

REINDEX [ ( VERBOSE ) ] { INDEX | TABLE } name [ SET TABLESPACE 
new_tablespace ]

CLUSTER [VERBOSE] table_name [ USING index_name ] [ SET TABLESPACE 
new_tablespace ]
CLUSTER [VERBOSE] [ SET TABLESPACE new_tablespace ]

VACUUM ( FULL [, ...] ) [ SET TABLESPACE new_tablespace ] [ 
table_and_columns [, ...] ]
VACUUM FULL [ FREEZE ] [ VERBOSE ] [ ANALYZE ] [ SET TABLESPACE 
new_tablespace ] [ table_and_columns [, ...] ]

Thereby I have a few questions:

1) What do you think about this concept in general?

2) Is SET TABLESPACE an appropriate syntax for this functionality? I 
thought also about a plain TABLESPACE keyword, but it seems to be 
misleading, and WITH (options) clause like in CREATE SUBSCRIPTION ... 
WITH (options). So I preferred SET TABLESPACE, since the same syntax is 
used currently in ALTER to change tablespace, but maybe someone will 
have a better idea.

3) I was not able to update the lexer for VACUUM FULL to use SET 
TABLESPACE after table_and_columns and completely get rid of 
shift/reduce conflicts. I guess it happens, since table_and_columns is 
optional and may be of variable length, but have no idea how to deal 
with it. Any thoughts?


Regards

-- 
Alexey Kondratov

Postgres Professionalhttps://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company


Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrey Borodin
Date:
Subject: Re: [WIP] CREATE SUBSCRIPTION with FOR TABLES clause (table filter)
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Change pgarch_readyXlog() to return .history files first