Re: Dell PowerEdge 2950 performance - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Vivek Khera
Subject Re: Dell PowerEdge 2950 performance
Date
Msg-id 8FF469B9-CD72-47ED-AD5C-1A2811787180@khera.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Dell PowerEdge 2950 performance  ("Bucky Jordan" <bjordan@lumeta.com>)
Responses Re: Dell PowerEdge 2950 performance  ("Bucky Jordan" <bjordan@lumeta.com>)
List pgsql-performance

On Aug 9, 2006, at 11:56 AM, Bucky Jordan wrote:

Here’s the hardware:

2xDual Core 3.0 Ghz CPU (Xeon 5160- 1333Mhz FSB, 4 MB shared cache per socket)

8 GB RAM (DDR2, fully buffered, Dual Ranked, 667 Mhz)

6x300 10k RPM SAS drives

Perc 5i w/256 MB battery backed cache


Is the PERC 5/i dual channel?  If so, are 1/2 the drives on one channel and the other half on the other channel?  I find this helps RAID10 performance when the mirrored pairs are on separate channels.

Your transfer rate seems pretty good for Dell hardware, but I'm not experienced with SAS drives to know if those numbers are good in an absolute sense.

Also, which driver picked up the SAS controller?  amr(4) or aac(4) or some other?  That makes a big difference too.  I think the amr driver is "better" than the aac driver.

Attachment

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Michael Stone
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and
Next
From: "Bucky Jordan"
Date:
Subject: Re: Dell PowerEdge 2950 performance