RE: Beta 6 Regression results on Redat 7.0. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mikheev, Vadim
Subject RE: Beta 6 Regression results on Redat 7.0.
Date
Msg-id 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A234D3339@sectorbase1.sectorbase.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Beta 6 Regression results on Redat 7.0.  (Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>)
Responses Re: Beta 6 Regression results on Redat 7.0.  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> I'm rerunning to see if it is intermittent. Second run -- no 
> error.  Running a third time......no error.  Now I'm confused.
>  What would cause such an error, Tom? I'm going to check on my

Hmm, concurrent checkpoint? Probably we could simplify dirty test
in ByfferSync() - ie test bufHdr->cntxDirty without holding
shlock (and pin!) on buffer: should be good as long as we set
cntxDirty flag *before* XLogInsert in access methods. Have to
look more...

Vadim


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Beta 6 Regression results on Redat 7.0.
Next
From: Lamar Owen
Date:
Subject: Re: Beta 6 Regression results on Redat 7.0.