RE: regressplans failures - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mikheev, Vadim
Subject RE: regressplans failures
Date
Msg-id 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A234D31A9@sectorbase1.sectorbase.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to regressplans failures  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: regressplans failures  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > #3  0x8149b98 in ExceptionalCondition (
> >     conditionName=0x81988a0 "!(((file) > 0 && (file) < 
> (int) SizeVfdCache
> > && VfdCache[file].fileName != ((void *)0)))", exceptionP=0x81b93c8,
> > detail=0x0,
> >     fileName=0x8198787 "fd.c", lineNumber=851) at assert.c:70
> > #4  0x8105e6e in FileSeek (file=33, offset=0, whence=2) at fd.c:851
> 
> I'm guessing this is a variant of the problem Philip Warner reported
> yesterday.  Probably WAL-related.  Vadim?

Probably, though I don't understand how WAL is related to execution plans.
Ok, it's easy to reproduce - I'll take a look.

Vadim


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Brian Hirt
Date:
Subject: Question about performance of planner
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: regressplans failures