> With the new oid file naming, the alternative database
> location feature has disappeared. Not good.
>
> Also, is there any merit in keeping the #ifdef
> OLD_FILE_NAMING code path?
No one. I've removed some of old code but not all, sorry.
> I could probably go through and fix this, but I'm not fully
> aware about the larger plan of table spaces that's apparently
> sneaking in here (cf. RelFileNode.tblNode).
This would be very appreciated. Table spaces will be in 7.2,
hopefully. For the moment tblNode is just database OID
(InvalidOid for shared relations). I think that to handle
locations we could symlink catalogs -
ln -s path_to_database_in_some_location .../base/DatabaseOid
TIA,
Vadim
