Re: Very confusing installcheck behavior with PGXS - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David E. Wheeler
Subject Re: Very confusing installcheck behavior with PGXS
Date
Msg-id 8DB510BE-4E06-4FAF-8719-54747E48FAE5@justatheory.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Very confusing installcheck behavior with PGXS  (Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>)
Responses Re: Very confusing installcheck behavior with PGXS  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Jan 7, 2016, at 11:20 AM, Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com> wrote:

>>> Also worth noting: the only reason I'm using pg_regress is it's the easiest
>>> way to get a test cluster. If not for that, I'd just use pg_prove since I'm
>>> already using pgTap.
>>
>> In 9.5 you might want to "use PostgresNode" which allows you to initdb
>> and such.
>
> Oooh, thanks! I might well just copy that into my pgxntool utility.

Is this documented somewhere? If it’s Perl, seems like it’d only be useful for those of us who compile from source,
yes?

David


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Function and view to retrieve WAL receiver status
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Windows: Make pg_ctl reliably detect service status