Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Very confusing installcheck behavior with PGXS - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jim Nasby
Subject Re: Very confusing installcheck behavior with PGXS
Date
Msg-id 568EBA7B.6030801@BlueTreble.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Very confusing installcheck behavior with PGXS  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Very confusing installcheck behavior with PGXS  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 1/7/16 1:04 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Jim Nasby wrote:
>
>> Also worth noting: the only reason I'm using pg_regress is it's the easiest
>> way to get a test cluster. If not for that, I'd just use pg_prove since I'm
>> already using pgTap.
>
> In 9.5 you might want to "use PostgresNode" which allows you to initdb
> and such.

Oooh, thanks! I might well just copy that into my pgxntool utility.
-- 
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Very confusing installcheck behavior with PGXS
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Function and view to retrieve WAL receiver status