Problems with protocol V3 after migration to latest driver - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Alexey Yudichev
Subject Problems with protocol V3 after migration to latest driver
Date
Msg-id 8BCBF9DB739F034B87FE7C7D30EAE55C03B1E45A@hqex2k.francoudi.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Problems with protocol V3 after migration to latest driver  (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>)
Re: Problems with protocol V3 after migration to latest driver  (Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>)
List pgsql-jdbc
I have recently tried to migrate to pgdev.307.jdbc3 driver and got several problems. The main purpose of upgrade was to
eliminate"idle in transaction" effect, because it caused the value of now() function to return values up to 30 minutes
backthe actual statement execution (due to connection being "idle in transaction" in the pool). 
Server version is 7.4.5 and I am connecting with compatible=7.1 because I use OIDs.
Setting protocolVersion to 2 fixed all the problems 2-4, however I'd like to know what is wrong with V3.

=========Problem 1 (Most severe)
It may seem strange, but once I installed a new driver on production servers, I got database server overload: update
showed16.0 and more, simple one-row updates by primary key executed for several minutes!. If I switched to my second
clientnode where the new driver was not yet installed, database load was becoming normal. It looks like somehow
statementsexecuted through the new driver caused a high database server CPU load. 

=========Problem 2.
The following statement

      PreparedStatement st = c.prepareStatement("SELECT count(*) FROM XXX WHERE ? IS NULL OR animated=?");
      st.setNull(1, Types.BOOLEAN);
      st.setNull(2, Types.BOOLEAN);
      ResultSet rs = st.executeQuery();

fails with V3 throwing an exception
java.sql.SQLException: ERROR: could not determine data type of parameter $1
    at org.postgresql.core.v3.QueryExecutorImpl.receiveErrorResponse(QueryExecutorImpl.java:1187)
    at org.postgresql.core.v3.QueryExecutorImpl.processResults(QueryExecutorImpl.java:990)
    at org.postgresql.core.v3.QueryExecutorImpl.execute(QueryExecutorImpl.java:138)
    at org.postgresql.jdbc2.AbstractJdbc2Statement.execute(AbstractJdbc2Statement.java:347)
    at org.postgresql.jdbc2.AbstractJdbc2Statement.executeWithFlags(AbstractJdbc2Statement.java:294)
    at org.postgresql.jdbc2.AbstractJdbc2Statement.executeQuery(AbstractJdbc2Statement.java:209)

=========Problem 3.
trying to use expression date_trunc('day', m.created AT TIME ZONE INTERVAL ?)
gives ERROR: syntax error at or near "$1"

=========Problem 4
        Table "public.binaryobject"
         Column         | Type | Modifiers
------------------------+------+-----------
 id                     | text | not null
 data                   | oid  |
 sound_previewobject    | text |
 sound_srcobject        | text |
 mmsmessage_messagedata | text |
 object                 | oid  |

Executing SQL: INSERT INTO binaryobject (id, data, object) VALUES (?, ?, ?)
Set parameter: index=1, jdbcType=VARCHAR, value=bo2782808080808080808080808080DB80
Set parameter: index=2, jdbcType=VARBINARY, value=[B@4735a0
Set parameter: index=3, jdbcType=VARBINARY, value=NULL (here setNull(3, Types.VARBINARY) is invoked)
java.sql.SQLException: ERROR: column "object" is of type oid but expression is of type bytea
    at org.postgresql.core.v3.QueryExecutorImpl.receiveErrorResponse(QueryExecutorImpl.java:1187)
    at org.postgresql.core.v3.QueryExecutorImpl.processResults(QueryExecutorImpl.java:990)
    at org.postgresql.core.v3.QueryExecutorImpl.execute(QueryExecutorImpl.java:138)
    at org.postgresql.jdbc2.AbstractJdbc2Statement.execute(AbstractJdbc2Statement.java:347)
    at org.postgresql.jdbc2.AbstractJdbc2Statement.executeWithFlags(AbstractJdbc2Statement.java:294)
    at org.postgresql.jdbc2.AbstractJdbc2Statement.executeUpdate(AbstractJdbc2Statement.java:249)

Is there a workaround for Promlems 2-4 other than using protocol V2?
Any comments on Problem 1?

pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Kris Jurka
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] JDBC +CIDR (fwd)
Next
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: Problems with protocol V3 after migration to latest driver