[GENERAL] Avoiding repeating simple field definitions - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Guyren Howe
Subject [GENERAL] Avoiding repeating simple field definitions
Date
Msg-id 8A417EFD-AF9A-4577-8A76-A01D50860421@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [GENERAL] Avoiding repeating simple field definitions  (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>)
Re: [GENERAL] Avoiding repeating simple field definitions  (John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com>)
List pgsql-general
I saw a thing somewhere about avoiding repeating the same field definitions. So an app I’m working on uses an exactly 6-character sting as an identifier, which appears in many places.

IIRC, the thing I read proposed defining a type AS IMPLICIT, but I’m not sure. Mainly because the docs urge caution with using AS IMPLICIT.

Thoughts?

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Job
Date:
Subject: R: [GENERAL] (solved) R: Very strange problem on index
Next
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Avoiding repeating simple field definitions