Re: Update Windows CI Task Names: Server 2022 + VS 2022 Upgrade - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Update Windows CI Task Names: Server 2022 + VS 2022 Upgrade
Date
Msg-id 898d87dc-5e58-4fbc-8307-c6f226b44e67@eisentraut.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Update Windows CI Task Names: Server 2022 + VS 2022 Upgrade  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 05.06.25 12:42, Thomas Munro wrote:
> I think on your C11 thread I might have been confused about that,
> since there was an implication that 2019 might support <stdatomic.h>,
> but it looks like 2019 added language stuff while 2022 added the
> library stuff.  But yeah, given your proposal that MSVC 2019 should be
> our new minimum target on that platform, I wonder if we should have
> both available in CI somehow...

It would be useful to have a leading and a trailing edge CI system for 
every OS family.  For example, say, Ubuntu 25.04 and RHEL 7, and VS 201x 
and VS 202y.  Because as we are seeing here, sometimes you're more 
concerned about breaking the old one, and sometimes you're more 
interested in using a feature on the new one.  Maybe one of the two 
could be manually triggered to save on resources.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Slot's restart_lsn may point to removed WAL segment after hard restart unexpectedly
Next
From: Bertrand Drouvot
Date:
Subject: Re: Avoid orphaned objects dependencies, take 3