On 18 November 2013 20:01 Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Haribabu kommi
> <haribabu.kommi@huawei.com> wrote:
> > On 17 November 2013 12:25 Amit Kapila wrote:
> >> On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Haribabu kommi
> >> >> >> Find the rebased version attached with this mail.
> >> >> >
> >> > ereport(ERROR,
> >> >
> >> (errcode(ERRCODE_CONFIG_FILE_ERROR),
> >> > errmsg("configuration
> file
> >> \"%s\" contains errors",
> >> > -
> >> ConfigFileName)));
> >> > +
> >> > + ErrorConfFile)));
> >> >
> >> > The ErrorConfFile prints "postgresql.auto.conf" only if there is
> >> > any parsing problem with postgresql.auto.conf otherwise it always
> >> > print
> >> "postgresql.conf" because of any other error.
> >>
> >> Changed to ensure ErrorConfFile contains proper config file name.
> >> Note: I have not asssigned file name incase of error in below
> >> loop, as file name in gconf is NULL in most cases and moreover this
> >> loops over
> >> guc_variables which doesn't contain values/parameters
> >> from auto.conf. So I don't think it is required to assign
> >> ErrorConfFile in this loop.
> >>
> >> ProcessConfigFile(GucContext context) { ..
> >> for (i = 0; i < num_guc_variables; i++)
> >> {
> >> struct config_generic *gconf = guc_variables[i];
> >>
> >> ..
> >> }
> >
> > Code changes are fine.
> > If two or three errors are present in the configuration file, it
> prints the last error
> > Configuration parameter file only. Is it required to be mentioned in
> the documentation?
>
> Do you mean to say parsing errors or some run-time error, could you
> explain with example?
LOG: parameter "shared_buffers" cannot be changed without restarting the server
LOG: parameter "port" cannot be changed without restarting the server
LOG: configuration file "/home/hari/installation/bin/../../data/postgresql.auto.conf" contains errors; unaffected
changeswere applied
The shared_buffers parameter is changed in postgresql.conf and port is changed in postgresql.auto.conf.
The error file displays the last error occurred file.
Is it required to mention the above behavior in the document?
Regards,
Hari babu
