Guten Tag Tom Lane,
am Samstag, 29. August 2020 um 17:19 schrieben Sie:
> TBH, this seems like a pretty awful data design. If you included the
> timestamp column into oms_rec, and had an index on it, then you would
> not need a join at all.
clt_rec and oms_rec are different types of data and only the former
includes the timestamp, that's simply how the stored data works. So if
at all, oms_rec needs to be embedded into clt_rec entirely. While I
considered that in the past already, wasn't sure if that is the best
approach to model those two different data types.
I'll make a note and consider refactoring at some point, so thanks for
your opinion!
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Thorsten Schöning
--
Thorsten Schöning E-Mail: Thorsten.Schoening@AM-SoFT.de
AM-SoFT IT-Systeme http://www.AM-SoFT.de/
Telefon...........05151- 9468- 55
Fax...............05151- 9468- 88
Mobil..............0178-8 9468- 04
AM-SoFT GmbH IT-Systeme, Brandenburger Str. 7c, 31789 Hameln
AG Hannover HRB 207 694 - Geschäftsführer: Andreas Muchow
