R: [GENERAL] Partitioned "views" - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Job
Subject R: [GENERAL] Partitioned "views"
Date
Msg-id 88EF58F000EC4B4684700C2AA3A73D7A08054EACC430@W2008DC01.ColliniConsulting.lan
Whole thread Raw
In response to [GENERAL] Partitioned "views"  (Job <Job@colliniconsulting.it>)
Responses Re: R: [GENERAL] Partitioned "views"  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-general
Hi Stephen.

>>The mat view takes longer and longer to update because it runs the full query.  What you really want to do is have a
side-tablethat you update regularly with appropriate SQL to issue UPDATE statements for just the current day (or
whatever).

If correct, i leave only last datas into "side-table" and syncronize only these datas in the materialized view.
If i delete datas from the side-table (ex- truncate) during the next materialized view update they will be lost or
remainintact? 

Thank you
Francesco


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Partitioned "views"
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: R: [GENERAL] Partitioned "views"