Home > mailing lists

Re: JSON for PG 9.2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From	David E. Wheeler
Subject	Re: JSON for PG 9.2
Date	December 21, 2011 01:07:14
Msg-id	88EBB749-A03C-434C-ADE7-20C1CCE4C887@kineticode.com Whole thread Raw
In response to	Re: JSON for PG 9.2 (Claes Jakobsson <claes@surfar.nu>)
Responses	Re: JSON for PG 9.2
List	pgsql-hackers

Tree view

On Dec 20, 2011, at 10:39 AM, Claes Jakobsson wrote:

> Are people explicitly asking for a) *JSON* datatype or b) a type that lets you store arbitrary complex semi-untyped
datastructures? 

Yes.

> if b) then this might get a lot more interesting

JSON is the most popular/likely way to represent that, I think.

David

pgsql-hackers by date:

From: "David E. Wheeler"
Date: 21 December 2011, 01:05:53
Subject: Re: JSON for PG 9.2

From: 高增琦
Date: 21 December 2011, 02:34:42
Subject: Re: why do we need create tuplestore for each fetch?

Re: JSON for PG 9.2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

Previous

Next