On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 9:06 PM, David E. Wheeler <david@kineticode.com> wrote:
> On Dec 20, 2011, at 10:39 AM, Claes Jakobsson wrote:
>> Are people explicitly asking for a) *JSON* datatype or b) a type that lets you store arbitrary complex semi-untyped
datastructures?
>
> Yes.
>
>> if b) then this might get a lot more interesting
>
> JSON is the most popular/likely way to represent that, I think.
On that note, here's an updated version of the patch I posted
upthread, with some regression tests and minimal documentation.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
