Re: shared_buffers Question - Mailing list pgsql-general
From | Joe Lester |
---|---|
Subject | Re: shared_buffers Question |
Date | |
Msg-id | 88E9BF6A-F121-11D8-BDD7-000A95A58EA0@sweetwater.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | shared_buffers Question (Joe Lester <joe_lester@sweetwater.com>) |
List | pgsql-general |
I'm doing a nightly vacuum... so I don't think that's it, although should I be doing a FULL vacuum instead? The size of my data directory is only about 389 MB. I'll take a closer look at file sizes going forward. echo "VACUUM ANALYZE VERBOSE;" | /Library/PostgreSQL/bin/psql -U postgres officelink 2>> vacuum.log Thanks. <bold><fontfamily><param>Lucida Grande</param><x-tad-bigger>From</x-tad-bigger></fontfamily></bold><fontfamily><param>Lucida Grande</param><x-tad-bigger>: </x-tad-bigger><bold><x-tad-bigger>"Scott Marlowe"</x-tad-bigger></bold></fontfamily><fontfamily><param>Courier</param> Your shared buffers are almost certainly not the problem here. 2000 shared buffers is only 16 Megs of ram, max. More than likely, the database filled up the data directory / partition because it wasn't being vacuumed. </fontfamily> <fontfamily><param>Courier</param>On Sat, 2004-07-31 at 10:25, Joe Lester wrote: > I've been running a postgres server on a Mac (10.3, 512MB RAM) with 200 > clients connecting for about 2 months without a crash. However just > yesterday the database and all the clients hung. When I looked at the > Mac I'm using as the postgres server it had a window up that said that > there was no more disk space available to write memory too. I ended up > having to restart the whole machine. I would like to configure postgres > so that is does not rely so heavily on disk-based memory but, rather, > tries to stay within the scope of the 512MB of physical memory in the > Mac. </fontfamily> I'm doing a nightly vacuum... so I don't think that's it, although should I be doing a FULL vacuum instead? The size of my data directory is only about 389 MB. I'll take a closer look at file sizes going forward. echo "VACUUM ANALYZE VERBOSE;" | /Library/PostgreSQL/bin/psql -U postgres officelink 2>> vacuum.log Thanks. From: "Scott Marlowe" Your shared buffers are almost certainly not the problem here. 2000 shared buffers is only 16 Megs of ram, max. More than likely, the database filled up the data directory / partition because it wasn't being vacuumed. On Sat, 2004-07-31 at 10:25, Joe Lester wrote: > I've been running a postgres server on a Mac (10.3, 512MB RAM) with 200 > clients connecting for about 2 months without a crash. However just > yesterday the database and all the clients hung. When I looked at the > Mac I'm using as the postgres server it had a window up that said that > there was no more disk space available to write memory too. I ended up > having to restart the whole machine. I would like to configure postgres > so that is does not rely so heavily on disk-based memory but, rather, > tries to stay within the scope of the 512MB of physical memory in the > Mac.
pgsql-general by date: