Re: Postgres Crash Running PLPGSQL Function on 8.2.3 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Gary Winslow
Subject Re: Postgres Crash Running PLPGSQL Function on 8.2.3
Date
Msg-id 88CCD18270AF9F46A8225246DD9B138F439396@atfsrv1.americantaxfunding.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Postgres Crash Running PLPGSQL Function on 8.2.3  ("Gary Winslow" <gary.winslow@atfs.com>)
List pgsql-general
Sorry, it took so long to build a test case, but I think I have
something reproducible that won't be a burden to transport.

What made this problem even more strange was that if my tables only
contained the record I was calculating with, then the problem would not
manifest.

So, I have stripped down the database a lot and its ready for posting.

Tom, how would you like me to get this to you?

Gary
gwinn7

-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Gary Winslow
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 8:46 AM
To: Tom Lane; Gary Winslow
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Postgres Crash Running PLPGSQL Function on 8.2.3

I need to extract the necessary database components to repro the problem
and find out how much data it will require.   I will need some time to
prepare that for sending.  I should be able to prepare something today,
or tomorrow.

My Thanks for giving this problem attention.   Until this is fixed, I
can't upgrade past this point (v8.1.8).

As said previously, my code works perfectly on 8.1.8 on Windows 2003
SP1.  A colleague of mine tested my code on a Postgres 8.2.3 running on
FreeBSD, and it too ran without incident.

-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Tom Lane
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2007 4:48 PM
To: Gary Winslow
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Postgres Crash Running PLPGSQL Function on 8.2.3

"Gary Winslow" <gary.winslow@atfs.com> writes:
> I would be happy to provide a "self-contained" test case.  I would
have
> to send to you a pg_dump of it which would be rather large to send via
> email.  Some of the code includes confidential business specific calc
> rules that I cannot release to the general public.

Understood; it won't go anywhere.  But how large is "rather large"?
Can you duplicate the problem with no (or less) data?

            regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
       match

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

               http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Andrej Ricnik-Bay"
Date:
Subject: Re: question
Next
From: "Drew Myers"
Date:
Subject: Postgres and geographically diverse replication