"Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> NikhilS <nikkhils@gmail.com> writes:
>> I just now realized that even though we allow the above. We do not allow:
>
>> pg=# create table t1 (a int, b int, unique(a+b));
>
>> Any specific reason for this behaviour?
>
> It'd be contrary to SQL spec. The UNIQUE constraint takes a list of
> column names, full stop.
Does the SQL spec actually specify what happens if you provide an
non-compliant table definition like this?
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com