Re: Another idea for index-only scans - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Gregory Stark
Subject Re: Another idea for index-only scans
Date
Msg-id 87y7gcy6gn.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Another idea for index-only scans  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Another idea for index-only scans  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Re: Another idea for index-only scans  (Decibel! <decibel@decibel.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Bruce Momjian" <bruce@momjian.us> writes:

> I have added another idea for index-only scans to the TODO list:
>
>>   A third idea would be for a heap scan to check if all rows are visible
>>   and if so set a per-table flag which can be checked by index scans.
>>   Any change to the table would have to clear the flag.  To detect
>>   changes during the heap scan a counter could be set at the start and
>>   checked at the end --- if it is the same, the table has not been
>>   modified --- any table change would increment the counter.

I think I would prefer to address this in the same infrastructure as the
dead-space-map. That way you're not dependent on having no updates happening
on the table at all. Any tuples on pages which contain no in-doubt tuples
could have their visibility check skipped but when you come across a tuple on
a page which has been modified since the last vacuum then you have to check
the visibility.

--  Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: change name of redirect_stderr?
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: CVS corruption/mistagging?