Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> What's a "not-to-follow dependency"?
In case of extensions the code follows dependencies to walk on all
objects. We already have the problem that an extension depending on
another is not relocatable, because 'ALTER EXTENSION SET SCHEMA' would
walk to objects of another extension (the one it depends on). We said
inter-extension dependencies could wait until later, so what you do here
is to declare your extension has not relocatable.
Now, if there are some dependencies between objects that are not of the
same extension, we have the exact same problem. That's what I called a
"not-to-follow" dependency for lack of a better term.
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
