>>>>> "Andres" == Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
>> 3. Do we need to do anything about how conversions from floats to
>> numeric work? At present they _ignore_ extra_float_digits
>> (presumably on immutability grounds) and convert using only DBL_DIG
>> digits of precision.
>>
>> I have no very strong position on this but incline to keeping the
>> existing behavior, though possibly it would be good to add functions
>> to get the round-trip value and possibly even the true exact value.
>> (It would be sort of nice if CAST(floatval AS numeric(400,18)) or
>> similar could work as you'd expect, but currently we treat that as
>> floatval::numeric::numeric(400,18) so the cast function doesn't know
>> about the eventual typmod.)
Andres> Hm. What's the argument to not just always use roundtrip-safe
Andres> conversion here?
Hmm.
I was thinking that the fact that the existing conversion didn't respect
extra_float_digits probably meant that people didn't care. But
searching, I do find some complaints about it, though mostly they get
brushed off with some variant of "you're doing it wrong". (Arguably any
float to numeric conversion is a fairly dubious practice.)
But I guess the case could be made for using the shortest-roundtrip-safe
value here too.
--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
