Re: Continuing encoding fun.... - Mailing list pgsql-odbc

From Marc Herbert
Subject Re: Continuing encoding fun....
Date
Msg-id 87vf1bq39w.fsf@meije.emic.fr
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Continuing encoding fun....  ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>)
List pgsql-odbc
"Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> writes:

> The ODBC API (defined by Microsoft of course) includes a number of *W
> functions which are Unicode variants of the ANSI versions with the same
> name.

I think one extra layer of confusion is added by the fact that POSIX
defines the type wchar_t as "the abstract/platform-dependent
character", W just meaning here: "W like Wide enough", whereas
Microsoft defines WCHAR as: "W like Unicode".  Microsoft's abstract
character being "TCHAR".

Am I right here?



pgsql-odbc by date:

Previous
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: Re: Continuing encoding fun....
Next
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: Re: Continuing encoding fun....