Re: partition insert performance - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Dimitri Fontaine
Subject Re: partition insert performance
Date
Msg-id 87vdmov2n0.fsf@hi-media-techno.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: partition insert performance  (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-admin
Hi,

Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Gurjeet Singh<singh.gurjeet@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> If you're using plpgsql prepare for a world of pain if you've got any
>>> null values in your inserts.
>>
>> :) Using COALESCE isn't that bad.
>
> In my experience it's WAY more than just coalesce.

There's this trick:

    v_sql := 'INSERT INTO schema.parent_' || to_char(NEW.date, 'YYYYMM') ||
             '     SELECT (' || quote_literal(textin(record_out(NEW))) || '::schema.parent).*;';

    EXECUTE v_sql;

This will handle dynamic SQL and NULLs correctly, but as said already
won't match static SQL in term of performances. Just saying for people
searching simplifications.

Regards,
--
dim

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Michael Monnerie
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL archiving and backup TAR
Next
From: Dimitri Fontaine
Date:
Subject: Re: Is IDLE session really idle?