Re: Concurrent psql patch - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Gregory Stark
Subject Re: Concurrent psql patch
Date
Msg-id 87sla07sgu.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Concurrent psql patch  (Jim Nasby <decibel@decibel.org>)
Responses Re: Concurrent psql patch  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Re: Concurrent psql patch  ("Jim C. Nasby" <decibel@decibel.org>)
List pgsql-patches
"Jim Nasby" <decibel@decibel.org> writes:

> I don't see how we could make the names shorter without moving away from a
> backslash command (which I'm guessing would be painful).
>
> Assuming we're stuck with a backslash command \cs[witch] and \cn
> [owait] seem to be about as good as we could get.

I don't have \cs or \cn set up as abbreviations.

I was originally thinking \c1, \c2, ... for \cswitch and \c& for \cnowait. I'm
not sure if going for cryptic short commands is better or worse here.

--
  Gregory Stark
  EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: ECPG patch to use prepare for improved performance
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Doc update for back-branches, CLUSTER and MVCC-safety