"Zoltan Boszormenyi" <zb@cybertec.at> writes:
> - the int8inc(), int2_sum() and int4_sum() used pointers directly from the
> Datums
> for performance, that code path is now commented out, the other code path
> is correct for the AggState and !AggState runs and correct every time and now
> because of the passbyval nature of int8, the !AggState version is not slower
> than using the pointer directly.
Does this mean count() and sum() are slower on a 32-bit machine?
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Get trained by Bruce Momjian - ask me about EnterpriseDB's PostgreSQL training!