Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 01:26:23PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> I'm fine with increasing this policy, but I don't have strong feelings. If we
>> feel the perlcritic policy change is too much, I would still prefer to go ahead
>> with the map rewrite part of the patch though.
>
> I have no issue either about the rewrite part of the patch, so I'd
> tend to just do this part and move on. Daniel, would you like to
> apply that?
Why the resistance to the perlcritic part? That one case is the only
violation in the tree today, and it's a pattern we don't want to let
back in (I will surely object every time I see it when reviewing
patches), so why not automate it?
- ilmari
